http://wiki.idcommons.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Bob+BlakleyIdCommons - User contributions [en]2026-06-09T10:34:18ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.31.6http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Current_events&diff=2799Current events2009-03-05T16:25:57Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>[http://iiw.idcommons.net/Iiw8 IIW '09a] is coming up in May</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=2629ID-Legal2009-01-19T18:52:16Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Draft Event Description */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== Participation ===<br />
<br />
If you would like to participate in the work of ID-Legal [http://lists.idcommons.net/lists/info/id-legal please join the mailing list by following this link].<br />
<br />
=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
Dedicated Dial-In Number: 1(309)946-5255 Access Code:659714<br />
<br />
* Thursday 12/11/08 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 12-11-08]]<br />
* Monday 11/10/08 at IIW - [http://iiw.idcommons.net/ID-Legal Notes from IIW in November]<br />
* Thursday 10/09/08 2PM PDT - 2nd call building from Monday's goof up [[ID-Legal 10-09-08]]<br />
* Monday 10/06/08 4:00 PM PDT - Figuring out Next Steps for Jan Conference [[ID-Legal 10-06-08]]<br />
* Thurs 08/28/08 10:00 AM PDT - IIW Legal: Review Charter and Articulation [[ID-Legal 08-28-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2009<br />
<br />
* Thurs 1/8/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 1-8-09]]<br />
* Thurs 2/5/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 2-5-09]]<br />
* Thurs 3/5/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 3-5-09]]<br />
* Thurs 4/2/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 4-2-09]]<br />
* Tuesday 5/18/09 at IIW<br />
<br />
=== Conference Planning ===<br />
[[ID-Legal Conf Plan Outline]]<br />
<br />
<br />
=== Draft Statement of Purpose ===<br />
<br />
ID-Legal conference brings together identity technologists and lawyers, academics and & public policy experts to explore and map the gap between the two fields. <br />
<br />
This mapping will :<br />
<br />
* Enable drafting of better regulation and policy being made to support safe use of online and digital identity.<br />
* Enable design of improved identity technologies that minimize risks, maximize protections and support policy based remedies.<br />
* Ensure consideration of the user experience of online and digital identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of their use. <br />
<br />
Interesting areas of intersection might be:<br />
<br />
'''Identity Technologies'''<br />
* Network Based Identity<br />
* End Points (XRI/OpenID)<br />
* Discover (XRD)<br />
* Linking of Accounts (Oauth)<br />
* Claims based Identity (infoCard)<br />
* Federation (SAML, Shiboleth)<br />
* Data Portability <br />
* 3rd party Identity "providers"<br />
* Social Graph Repositories<br />
<br />
''' Legal Perspectives'''<br />
* Transactional<br />
* Liability<br />
* Compliance<br />
* Case Law<br />
* Criminal Law<br />
* Policy<br />
* e-Governance<br />
* Security<br />
* Privacy<br />
* Cross-Jurisdictional<br />
<br />
<br />
This gathering is not about "finding solutions" to the above questions; the questions are big and will be solved by their respective communities. ID-Legal is about bringing the communities together so that, as they go forward with work on their respective problems, they have a common understanding of issues and a shared background of knowledge as context for their work.<br />
<br />
We hope through shared preparation to establish common ground; at the initial ID-Legal meeting we hope to surface issues and document a clear, shared understanding of the gaps between identity technologists and legal and policy professionals dealing with identity issues.<br />
<br />
We also see articulating from this map a core set of questions that can serve as the basis of future cross disciplinary dialogue working towards answers. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
An example of questions that fall into the gap between the two fields are:<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of online and digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
<br />
Traditionally the solutions in the legal world and in the technical world have been very different; it is becoming evident that there needs to be a shared understanding of issues in order to make progress in addressing them. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accommodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital and online identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital and online identity interact, so that digital and online identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital and online identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* Laws are not in sync with technology; this is creating friction <br />
* Technology when first released is not in synch with law; this puts pressure both on the technology and on the law, and both evolve<br />
* New Laws are coming out which create uncertainty in the technology markets; this can delay important advances in identity and privacy technology. <br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration in order to understand the answers to questions like these:<br />
<br />
* What does the law really think 'an identity' is (this may differ depending on context: e.g. Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal) <br />
* What do technologists mean when they use language describing identity; what technology are they building to support this understanding. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve; Daniel Solove's thesis is that the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
=== Potential Recommended Pre-Reading ===<br />
<br />
Article (link), where published, who wrote it - who recommended it. sentence about why.<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter<br />
<br />
<br />
---<br />
Logistical Details<br />
http://www.freeconference.com <br />
Login - ID-Legal PW:privacyonline</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=2628ID-Legal2009-01-19T18:48:32Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Draft Statement of Purpose */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== Participation ===<br />
<br />
If you would like to participate in the work of ID-Legal [http://lists.idcommons.net/lists/info/id-legal please join the mailing list by following this link].<br />
<br />
=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
Dedicated Dial-In Number: 1(309)946-5255 Access Code:659714<br />
<br />
* Thursday 12/11/08 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 12-11-08]]<br />
* Monday 11/10/08 at IIW - [http://iiw.idcommons.net/ID-Legal Notes from IIW in November]<br />
* Thursday 10/09/08 2PM PDT - 2nd call building from Monday's goof up [[ID-Legal 10-09-08]]<br />
* Monday 10/06/08 4:00 PM PDT - Figuring out Next Steps for Jan Conference [[ID-Legal 10-06-08]]<br />
* Thurs 08/28/08 10:00 AM PDT - IIW Legal: Review Charter and Articulation [[ID-Legal 08-28-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2009<br />
<br />
* Thurs 1/8/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 1-8-09]]<br />
* Thurs 2/5/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 2-5-09]]<br />
* Thurs 3/5/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 3-5-09]]<br />
* Thurs 4/2/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 4-2-09]]<br />
* Tuesday 5/18/09 at IIW<br />
<br />
=== Conference Planning ===<br />
[[ID-Legal Conf Plan Outline]]<br />
<br />
<br />
=== Draft Statement of Purpose ===<br />
<br />
ID-Legal conference brings together identity technologists and lawyers, academics and & public policy experts to explore and map the gap between the two fields. <br />
<br />
This mapping will :<br />
<br />
* Enable drafting of better regulation and policy being made to support safe use of online and digital identity.<br />
* Enable design of improved identity technologies that minimize risks, maximize protections and support policy based remedies.<br />
* Ensure consideration of the user experience of online and digital identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of their use. <br />
<br />
Interesting areas of intersection might be:<br />
<br />
'''Identity Technologies'''<br />
* Network Based Identity<br />
* End Points (XRI/OpenID)<br />
* Discover (XRD)<br />
* Linking of Accounts (Oauth)<br />
* Claims based Identity (infoCard)<br />
* Federation (SAML, Shiboleth)<br />
* Data Portability <br />
* 3rd party Identity "providers"<br />
* Social Graph Repositories<br />
<br />
''' Legal Perspectives'''<br />
* Transactional<br />
* Liability<br />
* Compliance<br />
* Case Law<br />
* Criminal Law<br />
* Policy<br />
* e-Governance<br />
* Security<br />
* Privacy<br />
* Cross-Jurisdictional<br />
<br />
<br />
This gathering is not about "finding solutions" to the above questions; the questions are big and will be solved by their respective communities. ID-Legal is about bringing the communities together so that, as they go forward with work on their respective problems, they have a common understanding of issues and a shared background of knowledge as context for their work.<br />
<br />
We hope through shared preparation to establish common ground; at the initial ID-Legal meeting we hope to surface issues and document a clear, shared understanding of the gaps between identity technologists and legal and policy professionals dealing with identity issues.<br />
<br />
We also see articulating from this map a core set of questions that can serve as the basis of future cross disciplinary dialogue working towards answers. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
An example of questions that fall into the gap between the two fields are:<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of online and digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
<br />
Traditionally the solutions in the legal world and in the technical world have been very different; it is becoming evident that there needs to be a shared understanding of issues in order to make progress in addressing them. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accommodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital and online identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital and online identity interact, so that digital and online identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital and online identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* laws not in sync with technology - creating friction (e-signature)<br />
* Tech comes out disruptive and the law doesn't know how to deal - causing evolution<br />
* New Laws coming out - creating uncertainty back into technology markets. <br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration to understand<br />
<br />
* what does the law really think 'an identity is' (depends on context: Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal?) <br />
* what do technologist mean when they use language describing identity and the technology they are building. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve Solove's thesis the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
=== Potential Recommended Pre-Reading ===<br />
<br />
Article (link), where published, who wrote it - who recommended it. sentence about why.<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter<br />
<br />
<br />
---<br />
Logistical Details<br />
http://www.freeconference.com <br />
Login - ID-Legal PW:privacyonline</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=2627ID-Legal2009-01-19T18:47:59Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Draft Statement of Purpose */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== Participation ===<br />
<br />
If you would like to participate in the work of ID-Legal [http://lists.idcommons.net/lists/info/id-legal please join the mailing list by following this link].<br />
<br />
=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
Dedicated Dial-In Number: 1(309)946-5255 Access Code:659714<br />
<br />
* Thursday 12/11/08 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 12-11-08]]<br />
* Monday 11/10/08 at IIW - [http://iiw.idcommons.net/ID-Legal Notes from IIW in November]<br />
* Thursday 10/09/08 2PM PDT - 2nd call building from Monday's goof up [[ID-Legal 10-09-08]]<br />
* Monday 10/06/08 4:00 PM PDT - Figuring out Next Steps for Jan Conference [[ID-Legal 10-06-08]]<br />
* Thurs 08/28/08 10:00 AM PDT - IIW Legal: Review Charter and Articulation [[ID-Legal 08-28-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2009<br />
<br />
* Thurs 1/8/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 1-8-09]]<br />
* Thurs 2/5/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 2-5-09]]<br />
* Thurs 3/5/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 3-5-09]]<br />
* Thurs 4/2/09 4pm EST, 1pm PST - [[ID-Legal 4-2-09]]<br />
* Tuesday 5/18/09 at IIW<br />
<br />
=== Conference Planning ===<br />
[[ID-Legal Conf Plan Outline]]<br />
<br />
<br />
=== Draft Statement of Purpose ===<br />
<br />
ID-Legal conference brings together identity technologists and lawyers, academics and & public policy experts to explore and map the gap between the two fields. <br />
<br />
This mapping will :<br />
<br />
* Enable drafting of better regulation and policy being made to support safe use of online and digital identity.<br />
* Enable design of improved identity technologies that minimize risks, maximize protections and support policy based remedies.<br />
* Ensure consideration of the user experience of online and digital identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of their use. <br />
<br />
Interesting areas of intersection might be:<br />
<br />
'''Identity Technologies'''<br />
* Network Based Identity<br />
* End Points (XRI/OpenID)<br />
* Discover (XRD)<br />
* Linking of Accounts (Oauth)<br />
* Claims based Identity (infoCard)<br />
* Federation (SAML, Shiboleth)<br />
* Data Portability <br />
* 3rd party Identity "providers"<br />
* Social Graph Repositories<br />
<br />
''' Legal Lenses'''<br />
* Transactional<br />
* Liability<br />
* Compliance<br />
* Case Law<br />
* Criminal Law<br />
* Policy<br />
* e-Governance<br />
* Security<br />
* Privacy<br />
* Cross-Jurisdictional<br />
<br />
<br />
This gathering is not about "finding solutions" to the above questions; the questions are big and will be solved by their respective communities. ID-Legal is about bringing the communities together so that, as they go forward with work on their respective problems, they have a common understanding of issues and a shared background of knowledge as context for their work.<br />
<br />
We hope through shared preparation to establish common ground; at the initial ID-Legal meeting we hope to surface issues and document a clear, shared understanding of the gaps between identity technologists and legal and policy professionals dealing with identity issues.<br />
<br />
We also see articulating from this map a core set of questions that can serve as the basis of future cross disciplinary dialogue working towards answers. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
An example of questions that fall into the gap between the two fields are:<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of online and digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
<br />
Traditionally the solutions in the legal world and in the technical world have been very different; it is becoming evident that there needs to be a shared understanding of issues in order to make progress in addressing them. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accommodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital and online identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital and online identity interact, so that digital and online identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital and online identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* laws not in sync with technology - creating friction (e-signature)<br />
* Tech comes out disruptive and the law doesn't know how to deal - causing evolution<br />
* New Laws coming out - creating uncertainty back into technology markets. <br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration to understand<br />
<br />
* what does the law really think 'an identity is' (depends on context: Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal?) <br />
* what do technologist mean when they use language describing identity and the technology they are building. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve Solove's thesis the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
=== Potential Recommended Pre-Reading ===<br />
<br />
Article (link), where published, who wrote it - who recommended it. sentence about why.<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter<br />
<br />
<br />
---<br />
Logistical Details<br />
http://www.freeconference.com <br />
Login - ID-Legal PW:privacyonline</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Dec_16_08_Conf_Call&diff=2421Identity Futures Dec 16 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T18:07:17Z<p>Bob Blakley: New page: * Call on Tuesday December 16th at 9AM Pacific ** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 == Agenda == Check in == Attendees == == Notes ==</p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Tuesday December 16th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
<br />
<br />
== Notes ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Next_call&diff=2420Next call2008-11-26T18:06:56Z<p>Bob Blakley: Removing all content from page</p>
<hr />
<div></div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2419Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T18:04:42Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
Potential funders: <br />
<br />
* Media companies (makers, payers, delivery conduits) are potential audiences: P&G, Ad agencies.<br />
* Healthcare organizations.<br />
* State & Federal policy authorities.<br />
* Trade associations (DMA, others)<br />
* Trade unions.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be made freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a .PDF presentation describing the results can be found [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf here]. Scenario-based planning exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.<br />
<br />
There was discussion of offering private interpretation sessions or other valuable services based on the public deliverables to funding sponsors.<br />
<br />
== Next Steps ==<br />
<br />
* Nick & John to meet soon.<br />
* A concrete proposal needs to be developed.<br />
* A list of organizations potentially interested in sponsorship needs to be developed.<br />
* Do we need to recruit selected individuals to join the planning effort?<br />
* Think about the elements of a story which we might use to pitch potential sponsors on the effort.<br />
* [[Identity Futures Dec 16 08 Conf Call|Next call]] will be Tue. 16 Dec at 9am PST.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Next_call&diff=2418Next call2008-11-26T17:59:29Z<p>Bob Blakley: New page: * Call on Tuesday December 16th at 9AM Pacific ** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 == Agenda == Check in == Attendees == == Notes ==</p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Tuesday December 16th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
<br />
<br />
== Notes ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2417Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:58:42Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
Potential funders: <br />
<br />
* Media companies (makers, payers, delivery conduits) are potential audiences: P&G, Ad agencies.<br />
* Healthcare organizations.<br />
* State & Federal policy authorities.<br />
* Trade associations (DMA, others)<br />
* Trade unions.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be made freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a .PDF presentation describing the results can be found [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf here]. Scenario-based planning exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.<br />
<br />
There was discussion of offering private interpretation sessions or other valuable services based on the public deliverables to funding sponsors.<br />
<br />
== Next Steps ==<br />
<br />
* Nick & John to meet soon.<br />
* A concrete proposal needs to be developed.<br />
* A list of organizations potentially interested in sponsorship needs to be developed.<br />
* Do we need to recruit selected individuals to join the planning effort?<br />
* Think about the elements of a story which we might use to pitch potential sponsors on the effort.<br />
* [[Next call]] Tue. 16 December at 9am PST. Call details: 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2416Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:57:10Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
Potential funders: <br />
<br />
* Media companies (makers, payers, delivery conduits) are potential audiences: P&G, Ad agencies.<br />
* Healthcare organizations.<br />
* State & Federal policy authorities.<br />
* Trade associations (DMA, others)<br />
* Trade unions.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be made freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a .PDF presentation describing the results can be found [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf here]. Scenario-based planning exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.<br />
<br />
There was discussion of offering private interpretation sessions or other valuable services based on the public deliverables to funding sponsors.<br />
<br />
== Next Steps ==<br />
<br />
* Nick & John to meet soon.<br />
* A concrete proposal needs to be developed.<br />
* A list of organizations potentially interested in sponsorship needs to be developed.<br />
* Do we need to recruit selected individuals to join the planning effort?<br />
* Next call Tue. 16 December at 9am PST. Call details: 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2415Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:45:12Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be made freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a .PDF presentation describing the results can be found [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf here]. Scenario-based planning exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.<br />
<br />
There was discussion of offering interpretation sessions or other valuable services based on the public deliverables to funding sponsors.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2414Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:44:36Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be made freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a .PDF presentation describing the results can be found [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf here]. These exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.<br />
<br />
There was discussion of offering interpretation sessions or other valuable services based on the public deliverables to funding sponsors.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2413Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:41:31Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be made freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a presentation describing the results can be found at [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf]. These exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2412Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:40:40Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
* Bob Blakley<br />
* John Kelly<br />
* Kaliya Hamlin<br />
* Tom Brown<br />
* Nick Givotovsky<br />
* Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a presentation describing the results can be found at [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf]. These exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2411Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:40:06Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
Bob Blakley<br />
John Kelly<br />
Kaliya Hamlin<br />
Tom Brown<br />
Nick Givotovsky<br />
Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
'''WHY'''<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
'''WHO'''<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
'''WHAT'''<br />
<br />
An "open source identity futures think tank" tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary.<br />
<br />
The organization's deliverables would be freely available to the public.<br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a presentation describing the results can be found at [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf]. These exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2410Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:38:51Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
Bob Blakley<br />
John Kelly<br />
Kaliya Hamlin<br />
Tom Brown<br />
Nick Givotovsky<br />
Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
== Notes: Business Plan ==<br />
<br />
WHY<br />
<br />
Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
WHO<br />
<br />
The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
WHAT<br />
<br />
An identity futures think tank tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary. <br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a presentation describing the results can be found at [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf]. These exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Futures_Nov_26_08_Conf_Call&diff=2409Identity Futures Nov 26 08 Conf Call2008-11-26T17:37:31Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>* Call on Wednesday November 26th at 9AM Pacific<br />
** 1 (906) 481-2100 - Access Code 942276 <br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
Check in<br />
<br />
Mini-Business Plan for this effort. <br />
* Why - what is the business reason for this?<br />
* Who - who would this be pitched to?<br />
* What - would we pitch to them?<br />
<br />
== Attendees ==<br />
Bob Blakley<br />
John Kelly<br />
Kaliya Hamlin<br />
Tom Brown<br />
Nick Givotovsky<br />
Jeff Stollman<br />
<br />
== Notes: Background Discussion ==<br />
<br />
John was intrigued by the Identity & Relationship management thrust at IIW but hasn't got all the context yet.<br />
<br />
Issues of pseudonyms, security of identity information, ownership of identity information are still unsolved<br />
<br />
Nick thinks policy issues get pushed to the back burner by technologists; we're building technologies which can (or are intended to) accomodate a wide range of policy environments. There's a desire to simplify technology to ease development & deployment. When the simplification is going on is the point at which the addition of new policy-based requirements are least welcome.<br />
<br />
But rejecting these requirements leads to unintended consequences. The IIW community is uncharacteristically aware of the policy issues - but how to apply this expertise productively to actual development projects remains a challenge.<br />
<br />
Lots of people are getting uncomfortable with the patchwork of state, national, and international privacy regulations and legislation - this complicates the environment in which businesses operate and it also paralyzes efforts to move forward with making better policy. Business execs are interested in what they can do to avoid lawsuits (and also new burdensome regulations).<br />
<br />
The HIPAA Privacy regulation had a motivation everyone agreed with, but the actual rule wasn't based on proven good practice, and as a result the rule has proven to be both burdensome and ineffective in implementation. It would be good to be able to make better rules in the future.<br />
<br />
Parallel organizations: Berkman Center sits at the intersection of policy and law.<br />
<br />
* WHY - Ferret out both unintended consequences and undiscovered opportunities inherent in identity technologies in order to provide feedback to developers to improve the offerings. Provide a source of input into policymakers' and senior technology executives' perspectives on impact of these technologies. A lot of people in the identity community have painted their own visions of the future, but there's no institution which serves as the focal point for agreeing on the landscape of potential futures. An organization could potentially provide better focus and alignment.<br />
<br />
* WHO - The audience will include policymakers, lawyers, and business executives as well as technologists. Participants will include members of the current identity community as well as people with more legal, policy, and business expertise.<br />
<br />
* WHAT - An identity futures think tank tasked to develop standards & best practices for how to do identity things in a way which minimizes "collateral damage"; this can serve as preemptive self-regulation to make imposition of government regulations unecessary. <br />
<br />
One possible deliverable would be to use scenario-based planning as a methodology (GBM and Northeast Consulting both have methodologies for this) to generate alternate planning futures. Harriet Pearson drove a scenario-based planning exercise for privacy at IBM; a presentation describing the results can be found at [http://www.almaden.ibm.com/institute/pdf/2003/HarrietPearson.pdf]. These exercises usually involve 30 or so involved experts, as well as outside experts, and a content team of 5 or more people working for 2 calendar months doing interviews, writing end-state descriptions for four outcomes, and documenting controlling assumptions and consequences, and writing about 100 future news stories to support the scenarios.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=1970ID-Legal2008-07-17T18:13:28Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Draft Event Description */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]] <br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
<br />
Dial in number: 1-309-946-5100<br />
Access code: 44241<br />
<br />
=== Draft Statement of Purpose ===<br />
<br />
Legal IIW aims to start a conversation which will answer questions like these:<br />
<br />
* What does the law think "an identity" is?<br />
* What do technologists mean when they use words like "identity" and "privacy"?<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of online and digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
* How can we make better laws to support safe use of online and digital identity?<br />
* How can we make better identity technology to minimize legal risks and maximize legal protections?<br />
* How can we engineer the user experience of online and digital identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of their use?<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accomodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital and online identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital and online identity interact, so that digital and online identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital and online identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* laws not in sync with technology - creating friction (e-signature)<br />
* Tech comes out disruptive and the law doesn't know how to deal - causing evolution<br />
* New Laws coming out - creating uncertainty back into technology markets. <br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration to understand<br />
<br />
* what does the law really think 'an identity is' (depends on context: Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal?) <br />
* what do technologist mean when they use language describing identity and the technology they are building. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve Solove's thesis the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1969Potential Partners2008-07-17T18:11:07Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>The event needs a host, an identified set of institutional co-conveners, and a targeted set of attendees.<br />
<br />
=== Host ===<br />
<br />
We want someone who can contribute an appropriate physical space, including network infrastructure and reconfigurable seating.<br />
<br />
=== Co-Conveners ===<br />
<br />
We (the ID-Legal group) are the conveners, but we need co-conveners.<br />
<br />
An important question is: what do we want out of a co-convener, and what do we think they can get out of it?<br />
<br />
A convener will probably be someone who has an interest in the topic area (so for example, a Law school which wants to expose its students to this kind of material, or a commercial enterprise which wants to participate for purposes of strategic planning, or a foundation which has this as part of its charter).<br />
<br />
Judi notes that USACM is interested in this topic and might be willing to be a convener.<br />
<br />
User groups or large technology vendors are also potential sponsors<br />
<br />
Consumer advocacy groups (ACLU, Consumers Union) are also potential sponsors.<br />
<br />
=== Invitees ===<br />
<br />
As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please list a name or company. Here's our preliminary list of participants<br />
to invite:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal#WHO<br />
<br />
Here's a list we've compiled of Identity companies:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=1968ID-Legal2008-07-17T18:08:42Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* NEXT CALLS */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]] <br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
<br />
Dial in number: 1-309-946-5100<br />
Access code: 44241<br />
<br />
=== Draft Statement of Purpose ===<br />
<br />
Legal IIW aims to start a conversation which will answer questions like these:<br />
<br />
* What does the law think "an identity" is?<br />
* What do technologists mean when they use words like "identity" and "privacy"?<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of online and digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
* How can we make better laws to support safe use of online and digital identity?<br />
* How can we make better identity technology to minimize legal risks and maximize legal protections?<br />
* How can we engineer the user experience of online and digital identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of their use?<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accomodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital and online identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital and online identity interact, so that digital and online identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital and online identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* laws not in sync with technology - creating friction (e-signature)<br />
* Tech comes out disruptive and the law doesn't know how to deal - causing evolution<br />
* New Laws coming out - creating uncertainty back into technology markets. <br />
<br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration to understand <br />
* what does the law really think 'an identity is' (depends on context: Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal?) <br />
* what do technologist mean when they use language describing identity and the technology they are building. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve Solove's thesis the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1967Potential Partners2008-07-17T18:02:31Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Conveners */</p>
<hr />
<div>As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please list a name or company. Here's our preliminary list of participants<br />
to invite:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal#WHO<br />
<br />
Here's a list we've compiled of Identity companies:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html<br />
<br />
=== Conveners ===<br />
<br />
In some sense we (the ID-Legal group) are the conveners, but we need co-conveners who can serve as hosts.<br />
<br />
An important question is: what do we want out of a co-convener, and what do we think they can get out of it?<br />
<br />
We want someone who can contribute an appropriate physical space, including network infrastructure and reconfigurable seating.<br />
<br />
A convener will probably be someone who has an interest in the topic area (so for example, a Law school which wants to expose its students to this kind of material, or a commercial enterprise which wants to participate for purposes of strategic planning, or a foundation which has this as part of its charter).<br />
<br />
Judi notes that USACM is interested in this topic and might be willing to be a convener.<br />
<br />
User groups or large technology vendors are also potential sponsors<br />
<br />
Consumer advocacy groups (ACLU, Consumers Union) are also potential sponsors.<br />
<br />
=== Invitees ===</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1965Potential Partners2008-07-17T17:59:40Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please send me a name or company. Here's our preliminary list of participants<br />
to invite:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal#WHO<br />
<br />
Here's a list we've compiled of Identity companies:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html<br />
<br />
=== Conveners ===<br />
<br />
An important question is: what do we want out of a convener, and what do we think they can get out of it?<br />
<br />
We want someone who can contribute an appropriate physical space, including network infrastructure and reconfigurable seating.<br />
<br />
A convener will probably be someone who has an interest in the topic area (so for example, a Law school which wants to expose its students to this kind of material, or a commercial enterprise which wants to participate for purposes of strategic planning, or a foundation which has this as part of its charter).<br />
<br />
Judi notes that USACM is interested in this topic and might be willing to be a convener.<br />
<br />
User groups or large technology vendors are also potential sponsors<br />
<br />
=== Invitees ===</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1964Potential Partners2008-07-17T17:57:57Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please send me a name or company. Here's our preliminary list of participants<br />
to invite:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal#WHO<br />
<br />
Here's a list we've compiled of Identity companies:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html<br />
<br />
An important question is: what do we want out of a convener, and what do we think they can get out of it?<br />
<br />
We want someone who can contribute an appropriate physical space, including network infrastructure and reconfigurable seating.<br />
<br />
A convener will probably be someone who has an interest in the topic area (so for example, a Law school which wants to expose its students to this kind of material, or a commercial enterprise which wants to participate for purposes of strategic planning, or a foundation which has this as part of its charter).<br />
<br />
Judi notes that USACM is interested in this topic and might be willing to be a convener.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1963Potential Partners2008-07-17T17:53:38Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please send me a name or company. Here's our preliminary list of participants<br />
to invite:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal#WHO<br />
<br />
Here's a list we've compiled of Identity companies:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1962Potential Partners2008-07-17T17:51:43Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please send me a name or company. I don't need contact details, just<br />
placeholders. Sending this info today before 10am would be ideal, thanks.<br />
<br />
Here's a list we've compiled of Identity companies:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=1961ID-Legal2008-07-17T17:49:54Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Links to Related Efforts */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]] <br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
<br />
Dial in number: 1-309-946-5100<br />
Access code: 44241<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* laws not in sync with technology - creating friction (e-signature)<br />
* Tech comes out disruptive and the law doesn't know how to deal - causing evolution<br />
* New Laws coming out - creating uncertainty back into technology markets. <br />
<br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration to understand <br />
* what does the law really think 'an identity is' (depends on context: Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal?) <br />
* what do technologist mean when they use language describing identity and the technology they are building. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve Solove's thesis the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal&diff=1960ID-Legal2008-07-17T17:49:08Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* For Further Reading */</p>
<hr />
<div>=== NEXT CALLS ===<br />
<br />
Call details:<br />
<br />
* Tue 07/01/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Setting Goals, Review Draft Description [[ID-Legal 07-01-08 Call]] <br />
* Tue 07/08/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: People and Groups [[ID-Legal 07-08-08]]<br />
* Thurs 07/18/08 10:00 AM - IIW Legal: Goal Review, Potential Partners [[ID-Legal 07-18-08]]<br />
<br />
Dial in number: 1-309-946-5100<br />
Access code: 44241<br />
<br />
=== Draft Event Description ===<br />
<br />
<br />
There is a lack of cross pollination between the legal community and technical community innovating digital identity systems. <br />
<br />
* laws not in sync with technology - creating friction (e-signature)<br />
* Tech comes out disruptive and the law doesn't know how to deal - causing evolution<br />
* New Laws coming out - creating uncertainty back into technology markets. <br />
<br />
<br />
We need to create a space for collaboration to understand <br />
* what does the law really think 'an identity is' (depends on context: Homeland Security/travel vs financial vs criminal?) <br />
* what do technologist mean when they use language describing identity and the technology they are building. <br />
<br />
"THE LAW" needs to needs to evolve Solove's thesis the law needs to carefully evolve to handle notions of reputations and identity in the online world. <br />
<br />
Individuals and Businesses have a joint interest in an identity system that allocates risk and rewards in a socially optimal way.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
An example where this kind of early collaboration would have been helpful is the PKI<br />
''this can be written into a better paragraph''<br />
Technologists take things at face value<br />
* previous wave of badness (post PKC) digital signature ( wouldn't it be cool if we could use them instead of paper ones)<br />
* never bothered to ask what a 'signature' was from the point of view of the law - shape of the ink on the paper - performance of the act - intention to commit oneself to the contract<br />
<br />
<br />
'''In the end Techies and Lawyers must make this whole environment that normal people can live in - they have not been talking to each other re: the problems let alone working better together to help regular people.'''<br />
<br />
<br />
=== WHO ===<br />
<br />
* '''Governmental entitles (fed, state, local, courts) & politicians'''<br />
** DHS (Homeland Security) - some good folks<br />
** Lawyers and staff for decision makers and the law (in congress, governors and state level), Barak and MaCain staff<br />
** Commerce Committee<br />
** NSA (Stewart Baker)<br />
** Law Enforcement<br />
** NCCUSL (Nat'l Conf Commission on Unified State Laws)<br />
** NCSL (Nat'l Conf State Legislators)<br />
** ALEC (Amer Legis Exchange Council)<br />
<br />
* '''Business and Corporate interests'''<br />
** MySpace, Facebook<br />
** Google, Yahoo, etc.<br />
** Intel<br />
<br />
* '''Universities, professors who have published papers, and law clinics'''<br />
** Solove<br />
** Susan Crawford<br />
** Michael Froomkin - U Florida<br />
** Beth Novak <br />
** Holly Tolle and Ray (?)<br />
<br />
* '''Consumer interest groups'''<br />
** Consumer's Union<br />
** National Consumer Law Center<br />
** Privacy Coalition people<br />
** EPIC<br />
<br />
* '''Professional associations'''<br />
** State and National Bar Assocs<br />
*** CyberLaw Committees of Bar Associations - and chairs<br />
** ACM<br />
** IEEE<br />
** Private Investigator Lobbying groups<br />
<br />
* '''Related interests'''<br />
** 22y olds - interesting Big learning curve<br />
** Direct Marketing Assn.<br />
** US Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''International Interests'''<br />
** Prime Project? (part of 7th framework, ITU)<br />
** Cisco & Joe Aledef (also International)<br />
** International Chamber of Commerce<br />
<br />
* '''RELEVANT Conferences'''<br />
** IIW<br />
** CFP<br />
** (others from call?)<br />
<br />
<br />
Eventually is Quick - in terms of going internationally<br />
<br />
International Businesses are already that way.<br />
<br />
* Entities from economic side are already dealing with it. <br />
<br />
By Proxy - UN folks from different initiatives, those thinking about the entire world - surrogate.<br />
<br />
=== Institutional Co-Conveners? ===<br />
<br />
* MIT Media Lab - called for a dialogue about id bill of rights<br />
* Careful of Gov. conveners - restrictions<br />
* Common scaffolding - survey type thing - set of protocols. Blind men examining the elephant - handiness<br />
** Different Languages coming together<br />
** Framework for them to invite a variety - more useful <br />
* Berkman<br />
* UN?<br />
* OECD - many initiatives going on<br />
<br />
=== For Further Reading ===<br />
<br />
Here are some pointers to papers on legal aspects of online identity that =JeffH has collected:<br />
<br />
[http://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php/Bibliography:_Legal_Aspects_of_Online_Identity Bibliography: Legal Aspects of Online Identity]<br />
<br />
=== Links to Related Efforts ===<br />
<br />
Here are a few more pages that might facilitate our future<br />
conversations. The first link is to the scenarios group, mentioned in<br />
our last call.<br />
<br />
Scenarios Group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Futures<br />
<br />
Identipedia<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identipedia<br />
<br />
Systemic Elements<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Systemic_Elements<br />
<br />
Inferred vs Actual - The evolution of policy<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Inferred_Vs._Actual_-_The_evolution_of_policy<br />
<br />
2008 Q1 Report Identity Rights<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/2008_Q1_Report_Identity_Rights<br />
<br />
We're also related to Identity Rights Agreements group<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Rights_Agreements_Charter</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Potential_Partners&diff=1959Potential Partners2008-07-17T17:46:32Z<p>Bob Blakley: New page: As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events, please send me a name or company. I don't need contact...</p>
<hr />
<div>As requested in our previous call, if you have any contacts or<br />
suggestions for people/companies who should be included in our events,<br />
please send me a name or company. I don't need contact details, just<br />
placeholders. Sending this info today before 10am would be ideal, thanks.<br />
<br />
Here's one of our lists:<br />
http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/Identity_Companies<br />
<br />
and a related outside list:<br />
http://identityaccessmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/05/vendor-list.html</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal_07-18-08&diff=1958ID-Legal 07-18-082008-07-17T17:46:03Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>10 AM PDT - 1PM EDT<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
1) Goals/Framing of event - [[Bob's new draft]]<br />
<br />
2) [[Potential Partners]] - prioritize and committments to contact about opportunity<br />
<br />
3) Venue/Date options - clarity on this need - how to gather information<br />
<br />
4) Patrick on [[Revenue Plan]]<br />
<br />
5) Invitation/Promotion strategy - Kaliya and Patrick<br />
* One EVENT - or series? what is the strategy - peoples thoughts?<br />
<br />
6) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_Charter Chater Review]<br />
<br />
7) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_07-08-08 Other action items from last call]. <br />
* Kaliya, Lucy and Daza on Process</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Revenue_Plan&diff=1957Revenue Plan2008-07-17T17:42:53Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Here's what I will try to learn about or resolve regarding the IIW & theTeam Legal-ID:<br />
<br />
* What is our fundraising history?<br />
* How can we more thoughtfully set pricing for attendance at our activities?<br />
* Can we sometimes hold linked events, with a high priced day (e.g., for Law Firms) followed by a lower priced, more open event?<br />
<br />
Question: can we start an IIW membership program with annual dues?<br />
<br />
Most non-profit donations are provided by individuals. I suspect that 70% of EFF's money is made of single membership donations. Corporations tend to give the next largest share, mainly for marketing purposes. Foundations give the least, and seldom to non-profits that don't have a track read of building a following of small donors.<br />
<br />
Most of what I believe about fundraising I learned from Kim Klein. (NOTE: http://www.grassrootsfundraising.org/)<br />
<br />
Kim's three core rules are:<br />
<br />
* plan, plan, plan and work the plan;<br />
* one must ask in order to receive; and<br />
* always interweave events with fundraising asks and with membership drives.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Revenue_Plan&diff=1956Revenue Plan2008-07-17T17:41:52Z<p>Bob Blakley: New page: Here's what I will try to learn about or resolve regarding the IIW & theTeam Legal-ID: 1. What is our fundraising history? 2. How can we more thoughtfully set pricing for attendance at ou...</p>
<hr />
<div>Here's what I will try to learn about or resolve regarding the IIW & theTeam Legal-ID:<br />
<br />
1. What is our fundraising history?<br />
2. How can we more thoughtfully set pricing for attendance at our activities?<br />
3. Can we sometimes hold linked events, with a high priced day (e.g., for Law Firms) followed by a lower priced, more open event?<br />
<br />
Question: can we start an IIW membership program with annual dues?<br />
<br />
Most non-profit donations are provided by individuals. I suspect that 70% of EFF's money is made of single membership donations. Corporations tend to give the next largest share, mainly for marketing purposes. Foundations give the least, and seldom to non-profits that don't have a track read of building a following of small donors.<br />
<br />
Most of what I believe about fundraising I learned from Kim Klein. (NOTE: http://www.grassrootsfundraising.org/)<br />
<br />
Kim's three core rules are:<br />
<br />
1. plan, plan, plan and work the plan;<br />
2. onw must ask in order to receive; and<br />
3. always interweave events with fundraising asks and with membership drives.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal_07-18-08&diff=1955ID-Legal 07-18-082008-07-17T17:41:21Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>10 AM PDT - 1PM EDT<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
1) Goals/Framing of event - [[Bob's new draft]]<br />
<br />
2) Potential Partners - prioritize and committments to contact about opportunity<br />
<br />
3) Venue/Date options - clarity on this need - how to gather information<br />
<br />
4) Patrick on [[Revenue Plan]]<br />
<br />
5) Invitation/Promotion strategy - Kaliya and Patrick<br />
* One EVENT - or series? what is the strategy - peoples thoughts?<br />
<br />
6) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_Charter Chater Review]<br />
<br />
7) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_07-08-08 Other action items from last call]. <br />
* Kaliya, Lucy and Daza on Process</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Bob%27s_new_draft&diff=1954Bob's new draft2008-07-17T17:39:05Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Legal IIW aims to start a conversation which will answer questions like these:<br />
<br />
* What does the law think "an identity" is?<br />
* What do technologists mean when they use words like "identity" and "privacy"?<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of online and digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
* How can we make better laws to support safe use of online and digital identity?<br />
* How can we make better identity technology to minimize legal risks and maximize legal protections?<br />
* How can we engineer the user experience of online and digital identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of their use?<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accomodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital and online identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital and online identity interact, so that digital and online identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital and online identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Bob%27s_new_draft&diff=1953Bob's new draft2008-07-17T17:32:20Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Legal IIW aims to start a conversation which will answer questions like these:<br />
<br />
* What does the law think "an identity" is?<br />
* What do technologists mean when they use words like "identity" and "privacy"?<br />
* Who adjudicates disputes in matters of digital identity and privacy?<br />
* What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
* How can we make better laws to support safe use of digital identity?<br />
* How can we make better identity technology to minimize legal risks and maximize legal protections?<br />
* How can we engineer the user experience of online identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of its use?<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accomodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital identity interact, so that digital identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Bob%27s_new_draft&diff=1952Bob's new draft2008-07-17T17:31:23Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Legal IIW aims to start a conversation which will answer questions like these:<br />
<br />
What does the law think "an identity" is?<br />
What do technologists mean when they use words like "identity" and "privacy"?<br />
Who adjudicates disputes in matters of digital identity and privacy?<br />
What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
How can we make better laws to support safe use of digital identity?<br />
How can we make better identity technology to minimize legal risks and maximize legal protections?<br />
How can we engineer the user experience of online identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of its use?<br />
<br />
Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accomodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital identity interact, so that digital identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Bob%27s_new_draft&diff=1949Bob's new draft2008-07-17T14:08:07Z<p>Bob Blakley: New page: Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called ...</p>
<hr />
<div>Information technology and the law have not been designed for each other. To cite just one example, technologists who did not understand the law of signatures designed an artifact called a "digital signature" which had few of the legal properties of a pen-and-ink signature; the result was a set of changes in the law of signatures to accomodate the new artifact. But the "digital signature" is neither technically nor legally an improvement on the old pen-and-ink signature. It places much stricter liability burdens on the signer (or presumed signer) than the pen-and-ink signature did, and it provides fewer due-process protections for those whose signatures are forged.<br />
<br />
Technologists are in the process of inventing artifacts called "digital identities". These seem likely to take on some of the properties of legal persons online. But they are not legal persons, and they have not (yet) been designed to keep real persons who come in contact with them safe.<br />
<br />
Digital identities, like robots, can be dangerous to real people. Isaac Asimov envisioned robots who would live by (that is, be compelled by their programming to obey) laws designed to keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Legal IIW workshop is to bring lawyers and technologists together to understand how the law and technology of digital identity interact, so that digital identity and the law can evolve together in ways that keep humans safe.<br />
<br />
There is some urgency to the task. Social networks are aggregating large amounts of personal data, and pressure is building on these networks to open their databases in the name of "data portability". ISPs and telecommunications providers are carrying huge volumes of conversations whose status with respect to government surveillance, carrier surveillance, and subpoena is unclear. Data moves back and forth across jurisdictional and national boundaries whose rules for protection of data (and even protection of persons) are unclear, or clear and incompatible. Location-aware handheld devices are tagging huge quantities of information with geographic data, allowing detailed reconstruction of many individuals' daily lives. It would be good to optimize both technology and the law to make the use of digital identity safe for humans before we have to learn where the hazards are the hard way - by experiencing disasters of privacy or fraud.<br />
<br />
The law, as usual, lags behind the technology - but as it works to clean up the mess disruptive technologies have caused, it undermines the assumptions made by the technologists and thereby creates uncertainty both in technology markets and in the people who use technology. The technology, as usual, moves forward without much consideration of how it will change the assumptions on which the law rests.<br />
<br />
Legal IIW aims to start a conversation which will answer questions like these:<br />
<br />
What does the law think "an identity" is?<br />
What do technologists mean when they use words like "identity" and "privacy"?<br />
Who adjudicates disputes in matters of digital identity and privacy?<br />
What happens when disputes involve multiple jurisdictions?<br />
How can we make better laws to support safe use of digital identity?<br />
How can we make better identity technology to minimize legal risks and maximize legal protections?<br />
How can we engineer the user experience of online identity so that people have realistic expectations about the legal implications of its use?</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal_07-18-08&diff=1948ID-Legal 07-18-082008-07-17T14:07:49Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Agenda */</p>
<hr />
<div>10 AM PDT - 1PM EDT<br />
<br />
Dial in number: 1-309-946-5100 Access code: 44241<br />
<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
1) Goals/Framing of event - [[Bob's new draft]]<br />
<br />
2) Potential Partners - prioritize and committments to contact about opportunity<br />
<br />
3) Venue/Date options - clarity on this need - how to gather information<br />
<br />
4) Patrick on Revenue Plan<br />
<br />
5) Invitation/Promotion strategy - Kaliya and Patrick<br />
* One EVENT - or series? what is the strategy - peoples thoughts?<br />
<br />
6) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_Charter Chater Review]<br />
<br />
7) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_07-08-08 Other action items from last call]. <br />
* Kaliya, Lucy and Daza on Process</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=ID-Legal_07-18-08&diff=1947ID-Legal 07-18-082008-07-17T14:06:46Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Agenda */</p>
<hr />
<div>10 AM PDT - 1PM EDT<br />
<br />
Dial in number: 1-309-946-5100 Access code: 44241<br />
<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
1) Goals/Framing of event - [Bob's new draft]<br />
<br />
2) Potential Partners - prioritize and committments to contact about opportunity<br />
<br />
3) Venue/Date options - clarity on this need - how to gather information<br />
<br />
4) Patrick on Revenue Plan<br />
<br />
5) Invitation/Promotion strategy - Kaliya and Patrick<br />
* One EVENT - or series? what is the strategy - peoples thoughts?<br />
<br />
6) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_Charter Chater Review]<br />
<br />
7) [http://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php/ID-Legal_07-08-08 Other action items from last call]. <br />
* Kaliya, Lucy and Daza on Process</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Reviews&diff=1667Reviews2008-06-19T18:34:14Z<p>Bob Blakley: New page: This page will contain links to reviews of the works in the Identity Bibliography.</p>
<hr />
<div>This page will contain links to reviews of the works in the Identity Bibliography.</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=IdMedia&diff=1666IdMedia2008-06-19T18:33:45Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to the Identity Media Review Group.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Identity Media Review Group is to support the Identity Commons community engaging with books, movies and other media that cover identity related topics. We do this by collecting a bibliography and by reviewing and discussing these media. We use the issues raised by these works to inform our work innovating the identity layer of the web and help us understand and address the social, psychological, legal, privacy, security, regulatory and ethical issues.<br />
<br />
We will host discussions of the items in the [[Identity Bibliography]] both online and via podcasts.<br />
<br />
Questions we'll try to address about each work in the bibliography include:<br />
<br />
* Why is this work important?<br />
<br />
* Is it fun to read/watch?<br />
<br />
* What identity and privacy themes does it explore?<br />
<br />
* What positions does it take on important identity and privacy questions?<br />
<br />
* What other work presents the most interesting contrast to this one?<br />
<br />
* If I like this, what else might I like?<br />
<br />
* If I hate this, what might I like?<br />
<br />
Details of how we will discuss these questions and where the discussions will be archived for your enjoyment will follow on the [[Reviews]] page</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=IdMedia&diff=1665IdMedia2008-06-19T18:32:32Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to the Identity Media Review Group.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Identity Media Review Group is to support the Identity Commons community engaging with books, movies and other media that cover identity related topics. We do this by collecting a bibliography and by reviewing and discussing these media. We use the issues raised by these works to inform our work innovating the identity layer of the web and help us understand and address the social, psychological, legal, privacy, security, regulatory and ethical issues.<br />
<br />
We will host discussions of the items in the [[Identity Bibliography]] both online and via podcasts.<br />
<br />
Questions we'll try to address about each work in the bibliography include:<br />
<br />
* Why is this work important?<br />
<br />
* Is it fun to read/watch?<br />
<br />
* What identity and privacy themes does it explore?<br />
<br />
* What positions does it take on important identity and privacy questions?<br />
<br />
* What other work presents the most interesting contrast to this one?<br />
<br />
* If I like this, what else might I like?<br />
<br />
* If I hate this, what might I like?</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1664Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T18:31:35Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Books: Nonfiction */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identities-Persons-Topics-Philosophy/dp/0520033094/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898207&sr=1-1 The Identities of Persons] by Amelie Oksenberg Rorty<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Future-Reputation-Gossip-Privacy-Internet/dp/0300124988/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898356&sr=1-1 The Future of Reputation] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Future-Internet-How-Stop/dp/0300124872/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898356&sr=1-2 The Future of the Internet and How To Stop It] by Jonathan Zittrain<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Social-Trust-Human-Communities-Govier/dp/0773516808/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898437&sr=1-1 Social Trust and Human Communities] by Trudy Govier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Boggs-Comedy-Values-Lawrence-Weschler/dp/0226893960/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898457&sr=1-1 Boggs] by Lawrence Weschler<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Essay-Concerning-Human-Understanding-Books/dp/0543739376/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898486&sr=1-1 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding] by John Locke<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Difference-Martin-Heidegger/dp/0226323781/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898527&sr=1-1 Identity and Difference] by Martin Heidegger<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Social-Construction-Reality-Sociology-Knowledge/dp/0385058985/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898588&sr=1-1 The Social Construction of Reality] by Peter Berger and Thomas Lockmann<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Guarding-Lifes-Dark-Secrets-Reputation/dp/0804757399/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898618&sr=1-1 Guarding Life's Dark Secrets] by Lawrence Friedman<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Privacy-Risk-Government-Surveillance-Amendment/dp/0226762831/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898642&sr=1-1 Privacy at Risk] by Christopher Slogobin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Rights-Wrongs-Origins-Experience-Injustice/dp/B0009K76B2/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898673&sr=1-1 Rights from Wrongs] by Alan Dershowitz<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Name-Meridian-Crossing-Aesthetics/dp/0804725551/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898699&sr=1-2 On the Name] by Jacques Derrida<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Privacy-Social-Philosophy-Policy/dp/0521786215/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898725&sr=1-12 The Right to Privacy] ed. by Ellen Frankel Paul et. al.<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Privacy-Ellen-Alderman/dp/0679744347/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898725&sr=1-1 The Right to Privacy] by Ellen Alderman & Caroline Kennedy<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hiding-Humanity-Disgust-Shame-Law/dp/0691126259/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898806&sr=1-1 Hiding from Humanity] by Martha Nussbaum<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Unwanted-Gaze-Destruction-Privacy-America/dp/0679765204/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898833&sr=1-1 The Unwanted Gaze] by Jeffrey Rosen<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Naked-Crowd-Reclaiming-Security-Freedom/dp/0375759859/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898855&sr=1-1 The Naked Crowd] by Jeffrey Rosen<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Rethinking-Identity-Metaphysics-Foundations-Philosophy/dp/0300068379/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898881&sr=1-1 Rethinking Identity and Metaphysics] by Claire Ortiz Hill<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Database-Nation-Death-Privacy-Century/dp/0596001053/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898905&sr=1-1 Database Nation] by Simson Garfinkel<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/No-Place-Hide-Robert-OHarrow/dp/B000WMOGTC/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898936&sr=1-1 No Place to Hide] by Robert O'Harrow<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Net-Privacy-Developing-Implementing-ebusiness/dp/0071370056/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898961&sr=1-1 Net Privacy] by Michael Erbschloe and John Vacca<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Social-Atom-Cheaters-Neighbor-Usually/dp/1596910135/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899001&sr=1-1 The Social Atom] by Mark Buchanan<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Private-I-Molly-Peacock/dp/1555973132/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899076&sr=1-6 The Private I] ed. by Molly Peacock<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Consciousness-Persons-Unity-Identity-Representation/dp/0262701138/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899236&sr=1-1 Consciousness and Persons] by Michael Tye<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Rites-Privacy-Trade-Limits-Protection/dp/0773521135/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899293&sr=1-1 Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade] by Elizabeth Neill<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Metamorphosis-Identity-Caroline-Walker-Bynum/dp/1890951234/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899365&sr=1-1 Metamorphosis and Identity] by Caroline Walker Bynum<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Toleration-Recognition-Anna-Elisabetta-Galeotti/dp/0521619939/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899464&sr=1-1 Toleration as Recognition] by Anna Elisabetta Galeotti<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Difficulty-Tolerance-Essays-Political-Philosophy/dp/0521533988/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899600&sr=1-1 The Difficulty of Tolerance] T.M. Scanlon<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Multiple-Studies-Rationality-Social-Change/dp/0521346835/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213900168&sr=1-9 The Multiple Self] ed. by Jon Elster<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Ontology-Identity-Modality-Metaphysics-Philosophy/dp/0521795486/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213900098&sr=1-1 Ontology, Identity, and Modality] by Peter van Inwagen<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Fingerprints-Origins-Detection-Launched-Forensic/dp/0786866071/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213900040&sr=1-1 Biometric Systems] by James Wayman et. al.<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Fingerprints-Origins-Detection-Launched-Forensic/dp/0786866071/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213900040&sr=1-1 Fingerprints] by Colin Beavan<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Whos-Watching-You-Surveillance-Conspiracy/dp/1932857575/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213900275&sr=1-1 Who's Watching You?] by Mick Farren and John Gibb<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by David Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/ Blade Runner]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405296/ A Scanner Darkly]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100802/ Total Recall]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049366/ Invasion of the Body Snatchers]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==<br />
<br />
== Web Pages ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1663Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T18:20:26Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Books: Nonfiction */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identities-Persons-Topics-Philosophy/dp/0520033094/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898207&sr=1-1 The Identities of Persons] by Amelie Oksenberg Rorty<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Future-Reputation-Gossip-Privacy-Internet/dp/0300124988/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898356&sr=1-1 The Future of Reputation] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Future-Internet-How-Stop/dp/0300124872/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898356&sr=1-2 The Future of the Internet and How To Stop It] by Jonathan Zittrain<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Social-Trust-Human-Communities-Govier/dp/0773516808/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898437&sr=1-1 Social Trust and Human Communities] by Trudy Govier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Boggs-Comedy-Values-Lawrence-Weschler/dp/0226893960/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898457&sr=1-1 Boggs] by Lawrence Weschler<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Essay-Concerning-Human-Understanding-Books/dp/0543739376/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898486&sr=1-1 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding] by John Locke<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Difference-Martin-Heidegger/dp/0226323781/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898527&sr=1-1 Identity and Difference] by Martin Heidegger<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Social-Construction-Reality-Sociology-Knowledge/dp/0385058985/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898588&sr=1-1 The Social Construction of Reality] by Peter Berger and Thomas Lockmann<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Guarding-Lifes-Dark-Secrets-Reputation/dp/0804757399/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898618&sr=1-1 Guarding Life's Dark Secrets] by Lawrence Friedman<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Privacy-Risk-Government-Surveillance-Amendment/dp/0226762831/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898642&sr=1-1 Privacy at Risk] by Christopher Slogobin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Rights-Wrongs-Origins-Experience-Injustice/dp/B0009K76B2/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898673&sr=1-1 Rights from Wrongs] by Alan Dershowitz<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Name-Meridian-Crossing-Aesthetics/dp/0804725551/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898699&sr=1-2 On the Name] by Jacques Derrida<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Privacy-Social-Philosophy-Policy/dp/0521786215/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898725&sr=1-12 The Right to Privacy] ed. by Ellen Frankel Paul et. al.<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Privacy-Ellen-Alderman/dp/0679744347/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898725&sr=1-1 The Right to Privacy] by Ellen Alderman & Caroline Kennedy<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hiding-Humanity-Disgust-Shame-Law/dp/0691126259/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898806&sr=1-1 Hiding from Humanity] by Martha Nussbaum<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Unwanted-Gaze-Destruction-Privacy-America/dp/0679765204/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898833&sr=1-1 The Unwanted Gaze] by Jeffrey Rosen<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Naked-Crowd-Reclaiming-Security-Freedom/dp/0375759859/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898855&sr=1-1 The Naked Crowd] by Jeffrey Rosen<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Rethinking-Identity-Metaphysics-Foundations-Philosophy/dp/0300068379/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898881&sr=1-1 Rethinking Identity and Metaphysics] by Claire Ortiz Hill<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Database-Nation-Death-Privacy-Century/dp/0596001053/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898905&sr=1-1 Database Nation] by Simson Garfinkel<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/No-Place-Hide-Robert-OHarrow/dp/B000WMOGTC/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898936&sr=1-1 No Place to Hide] by Robert O'Harrow<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Net-Privacy-Developing-Implementing-ebusiness/dp/0071370056/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213898961&sr=1-1 Net Privacy] by Michael Erbschloe and John Vacca<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Social-Atom-Cheaters-Neighbor-Usually/dp/1596910135/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899001&sr=1-1 The Social Atom] by Mark Buchanan<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Private-I-Molly-Peacock/dp/1555973132/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899076&sr=1-6 The Private I] ed. by Molly Peacock<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Consciousness-Persons-Unity-Identity-Representation/dp/0262701138/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899236&sr=1-1 Consciousness and Persons] by Michael Tye<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Rites-Privacy-Trade-Limits-Protection/dp/0773521135/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899293&sr=1-1 Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade] by Elizabeth Neill<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Metamorphosis-Identity-Caroline-Walker-Bynum/dp/1890951234/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899365&sr=1-1 Metamorphosis and Identity] by Caroline Walker Bynum<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Toleration-Recognition-Anna-Elisabetta-Galeotti/dp/0521619939/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899464&sr=1-1 Toleration as Recognition] by Anna Elisabetta Galeotti<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Difficulty-Tolerance-Essays-Political-Philosophy/dp/0521533988/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213899600&sr=1-1 The Difficulty of Tolerance] T.M. Scanlon<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by David Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/ Blade Runner]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405296/ A Scanner Darkly]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100802/ Total Recall]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049366/ Invasion of the Body Snatchers]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==<br />
<br />
== Web Pages ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=IdMedia&diff=1662IdMedia2008-06-19T17:51:02Z<p>Bob Blakley: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to the Identity Media Review Group.<br />
<br />
The purpose of the Identity Media Review Group is to support the Identity Commons community engaging with books, movies and other media that cover identity related topics. We do this by collecting a bibliography and by reviewing and discussing these media. We use the issues raised by these works to inform our work innovating the identity layer of the web and help us understand and address the social, psychological, legal, privacy, security, regulatory and ethical issues.<br />
<br />
We will host discussions of the items in the [[Identity Bibliography]] both online and via podcasts.<br />
<br />
Questions we'll try to address about each work in the bibliography include:<br />
<br />
* Why is this work important?<br />
<br />
* Is it fun to read/watch?<br />
<br />
* What identity and privacy themes does it explore?<br />
<br />
* What positions does it take on important identity and privacy questions?</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1661Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T17:47:30Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Movies: Drama */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by David Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/ Blade Runner]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405296/ A Scanner Darkly]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100802/ Total Recall]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049366/ Invasion of the Body Snatchers]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==<br />
<br />
== Web Pages ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1660Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T17:41:14Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Movies: Drama */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by David Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/ Blade Runner]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405296/ A Scanner Darkly]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100802/ Total Recall]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==<br />
<br />
== Web Pages ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1659Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T17:37:50Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Movies: Documentary */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by David Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==<br />
<br />
== Web Pages ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1658Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T17:35:54Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Books: Nonfiction */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Daniel Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by David Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1657Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T17:35:12Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Movies: Drama */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ Gattaca]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120660/ Enemy of the State]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258463/ The Bourne Identity]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/ Minority Report]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/ The Departed]<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==</div>Bob Blakleyhttp://wiki.idcommons.net/index.php?title=Identity_Bibliography&diff=1656Identity Bibliography2008-06-19T17:31:53Z<p>Bob Blakley: /* Books: Fiction */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Books: Nonfiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Identity-Phillip-Windley/dp/0596008783 Digital Identity] by Phil Windley<br />
<br />
* [http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Solove-Digital-Person.htm The Digital Person] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b/102-8850244-9371323Identity Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood] by Jim Harper<br />
<br />
* [http://www.schneier.com/book-beyondfear.html Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World] by Bruce Schneier<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Hello-World-Life-Ham-Radio/dp/156898281X Hello World: A Life in Ham Radio] by Danny G<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/IP-Location-Martin-Dawson/dp/0072263776/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179234&sr=1-1 IP Location] (Dawson, Winterbottom, Thomson)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Screen-Identity-Age-Internet/dp/0684833484/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179290&sr=1-1 Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet] by Sherry Turkle<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Massively-Multiplayer-Game-Development/dp/1584502436/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179414&sr=1-1Massively Multiplayer Game Development]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Innovative-Technology/dp/0136832105/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179472&sr=1-1The Little Black Book: Mail Bonding with OSI Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4625252-0849506?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Understanding+and+Deploying+LDAP+Directory+Services&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Protocol-Control-Exists-Decentralization-Leonardo/dp/0262572338/ref=sr_1_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179573&sr=1-1 Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Support-Economy-Corporations-Individuals-Capitalism/dp/0142003883/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179636&sr=1-1 The Support Economy] especially the third section outlines as vision for VRM<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Identity-Theft-Avoidance-Possible/dp/0387345892 Economics Identity Theft Avoidance]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Society-Technology-Between-Privacy/dp/0738201448/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8850244-9371323?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190179748&sr=1-1 Transparent Society] by Brin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0816632502/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3211068538/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Trust in the Network Economy] (Evolaris)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Suspect-Identities-Fingerprinting-Criminal-Identification/dp/0674010027/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438245&sr=1-1 Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0761956107/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-5473919-9263820?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Surveillance-Social-Sorting-Privacy-Discrimination/dp/0415278724/ref=sr_1_1/103-5473919-9263820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193438356&sr=1-1 Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination]<br />
<br />
== Books: Fiction ==<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Case-Dr-Jekyll-Hyde/dp/0141439734/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213895971&sr=8-4 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde] by Robert Louis Stevenson<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Library-Classics-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/081297462X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896084&sr=8-2 We] by Yevgeny Zamyatin<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell/dp/0451516753/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896165&sr=8-5 1984] by George Orwell<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0586044345/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896463&sr=8-4 Brave New World] by Aldous Huxley<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/Three-Theban-Plays-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140444254/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896626&sr=8-24 Oedipus the King] by Sophocles (tr. Robert Fagles)<br />
<br />
* [http://www.amazon.com/True-Names-Opening-Cyberspace-Frontier/dp/0312862075/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213896693&sr=8-1 True Names] by Vernor Vinge<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Academic ==<br />
<br />
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2004-04 Accountable Net]<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294 Model Regime of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622 A Taxonomy of Privacy] by Solove<br />
<br />
* Rains and Scott. "Identify of or not identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication." Communication Theory 17 (2007) 61-91.<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Personal ==<br />
<br />
* [http://asn.planetwork.net/ Augmented Social Network]<br />
<br />
== White Papers: Commercial ==<br />
<br />
== Movies: Drama ==<br />
* Gattaca<br />
<br />
* Enemy of the State<br />
<br />
* The Bourne Identity<br />
<br />
* Minority Report<br />
<br />
* The Departed<br />
<br />
== Movies: Documentary ==</div>Bob Blakley